My Favorite Films, Plague Edition (Part 6): Gay Coming-of-Age Films
My Beautiful Laundrette (1985)
Directed by Steven Frears
Starring Daniel Day-Lewis and Gordon Warnecke
Maurice (1987)
Directed by James Ivory
Starring James Wilby and Rupert Graves
Y tu Mamá También (2001)
Directed by Alfonso Cuarón
Starring Gael Garcia Bernal
Gay male coming out/coming of age movies have always drawn
actors and directors beyond what you would expect of typical teen fare. Some of
this may be a mix of gay directors and screenwriters portraying their life
experience, but this not always so…a diverse mix of artists has tackled this
genre. Why? Beyond the usual teen opportunities for angst, cute actors, nice
bodies, and party scenes, there is an irresistible overlay here, in that one or
more characters must hide who they are, from themselves, their family/friends,
or both. Lesbian dramas do not seem to have as much of that, perhaps because of
the historically greater tolerance for lesbians, as well as the paucity of
opportunities for women directors and writers. So in the male coming-out film,
there are all the elements present for high drama and challenging acting. I rewatched
several of these films this week, and noticed both some common themes and
interesting evolution as society has become more tolerant. How can you still
make an angst-filled coming-out film in the era of gay marriage and more global
acceptance?
The Two Progenitors
Two films from the height of the AIDS era, My Beautiful
Laundrette (1985) and Maurice (1987), remain outstanding, well made
versions of this genre. Laundrette was the breakout film for Daniel
Day-Lewis (above), playing the punk skinhead Johnny in Thatcherite England who falls in
love with an old Pakistani school chum, Omar. The film sets a few genre ground rules,
but remains exceptional even now. The challenge for Omar’s pairing off with Johnny
are the social rules of their two clans: a big extended Pakistani family for
Omar and racially/sexually intolerant punk culture for Johnny. The fun thing
about this film is that it is a comedy (rare in this overheated genre) and that
there is never any internal angst for either guy about their sexuality or love
or lust…the only problem is doing the slalom course around family and friends. So
this film is really more a film about the racial and class division of Thatcher
England, with the gay awareness plot as the driver. It’s a charming film which depicts
gay men teasing each other, playing around, and acting pretty normal. That
makes it unusual for its era, when gay men were more often shown as circus
freaks. Maurice is equally good, but is another beast entirely. Based on
a suppressed novel by E.M. Forrester, it depicts three gay men of 1910-20 who
interact in complex ways. This was another breakout role, this time for Hugh
Grant, playing the repressed Cambridge student Clive who falls for Maurice (James
Wilby, below). They romance each other that time honored British private school
homosexual tradition that often seems more intellectual than physical (lots of translating
of Greek texts in tutorial, skipping, as the tutor says, references to “the unspeakable
vice of the Greeks”). But Maurice has real love/lust and, frustrated by Clive’s
reluctance to commit, falls for the randy estate gamekeeper, fully experiences passionate
sex, then never turns back. This is the main prototype film of the genre. There
is lots of internal angst (except by the gamekeeper) and much societal
rejection and repression of homosexuality in the era of Oscar Wilde’s imprisonment.
This film is all about angst and struggle and finding yourself, with the
typical British overlay of class tensions, all portrayed by director Ivory amidst
the typical gorgeous upper class country estates. When the film ends with
swelling violins and the romantic reunion of Maurice with the gamekeeper, we are
thrilled, if a bit skeptical, that Maurice has really given up his career,
status, and societal standing for love of a common man. But it is an excellent tearjerker
nonetheless. It turns out that these two films, well made, well-acted, and popular
happy-ending tonics to AIDS devastation of the gay community, would remain
atypical for years. Mostly, when gay men appeared in movies, they generally had
to hide, die (Tom Hanks Philadelphia, 1993) or fade into the background as
a colorful accessory to the featured straight romance. It is only in the last decade that happy
endings really reappeared in mainstream gay coming-out movies.
The Descendants
A big revival happened with the superb Y tu Mamá
También
(2001), the first big international hit of Mexican director Alfonso Cuarón
(Harry Potter, Gravity, Roma). This wildly creative film is basically a
road movie of two “straight” horny teenagers (including the outstanding young Gael Garcia
Bernal, below), whose trip to the beach with a voluptuous older woman ends up with a
three-way group sex scene that mixes eroticism, innocence, awkwardness, and wonder
in equal measures. This is just as a first-time sexual encounter should be
shown, but rarely is. The film’s unpredictability, natural depiction of rowdy
male teen behavior, and frequent changes in direction are fantastic. Here we
are left with a fascinatingly neutral ending. After their sex together, the two
friends, embarrassed, just drift apart from one another, a daring way to end a
movie, eschewing the upbeat resolution of Laundrette or Maurice. The
drifting apart is in mostly due to the implied machismo of Mexican culture, which
makes the two friends’ sexual act impossible for them to process, not to
mention embrace. See this movie if you have not.
I wondered how this genre had fared in an era of increasing
international tolerance of homosexuality. What would happen to all that
dramatic struggle, repression and angst? Well, it is still there, and still
driving film plot lines, just differently. In the Icelandic Heartstone
(2016), a very young adolescent falls in love with a prepubertal straight guy
friend in a backdrop of an intrusive, conservative rural community, acting out the
traditional angst scenario on a backdrop of spectacular Icelandic landscape. In
the Swiss Mario (2018) it’s the same deal, but now the repressive background
is male sports, one of the final bastions of homophobia. Two professional soccer
players fall in love, one more confidently than the other (another common pattern
in both movies and life), and they end up drifting apart because one does not
want to jeopardize his professional career. Neither of these films ends up with
false upbeat resolution…the guys pretty much do realistic things. That tends to
characterize European movies generally. Realism trumps fantasy and tragedy.
The opposite occurs in the most lauded “gay film” from the
US in recent years. Brokeback Mountain (2005) has all the familiar coming-out
angst and societal repression (this time the mores of the conservative rural
West), but is in fact quite retrograde, in that the gay guy who actually acts
out his sexuality gets killed as a result. But we finally get a really modern
gay coming out film from an American director with the Barry Jenkins’ Oscar-winning
Moonlight (2016), a strange, somber, complex film of coming-out in an
unsympathetic black underclass. It feels like the characters are in their own
socially-isolated island, much like the upper-crust characters of Maurice.
But the film ends daringly (for a US film) with neither a gay death nor a romantic
reconciliation of the separated lovers (separated here by incarceration). I
applaud the Academy for awarding a film with such a nebulous, realistic ending.
The Millenials and GenZers, of course, are far more tolerant
of all things GLBTQ, and are mostly bored with traditional gay issues, having
moved on to transgender as their “thing”. So it is not surprising that the most
recent teen gay male films treat the subject more matter-of-factly. Best of these
are the Brazilian The Way He Looks (2014), where two adorable teens (above),
one blind, that fall in love, face some minimal classmate resistance and
teasing, then walk off hand-in-hand. The film ingeniously imagines how a blind
young teen would imagine his lover, and how he substitutes smell and touch as
his erotic pathways. Henry Gamble’s Birthday Party (2015) and The
Falls (2012) are lesser efforts, but rev up the old societal repression
angle by having gay love blossom in the evangelical Protestant and Mormon
cultures, respectively. And, returning to the happy ending-with-violins tradition
of Maurice, Love, Simon (2018) ends with kissing on a Ferris wheel,
replete with fireworks and the cheers of classmates (below). But most of the
movie is strikingly angst-free, except for the angst of not knowing the identity
of your secret lover-pen pal. So its mostly a formulaic teen film, just with gay
characters…quite a revolution in its own way. So, all in all, gay coming-out
movies reflect the changes of society, but have still not become extinct with
greater societal acceptance. So far, it seems like the old formulas still work,
and still make a good movie.
Comments
Post a Comment