Film Reviews: My Favorite Films, Plague Edition (Part 1)
Au Hasard Balthazar (1966)
Written and Directed by Robert Bresson
Vagabond (1985)
Written and Directed by Agnès Varda
Well, dear readers. I have been able to keep up my live performance
reviews until now, but with Broadway and the NY arts scene shut down, like the rest
of you I have been confined to a world
of online work, novels, and film. Luckily, the Criterion Channel exists, providing
a rich source of fine films that can keep the cinephile occupied indefinitely.
With some time on my hands, I thought this would be a good opportunity to
revisit some of the great films resident in my memory-banks. Are they really as
good as I remembered? And do they remind me of other films I might have seen in
intervening years? So we will see how many editions this memory-lane film
retrospective lasts--I will continue until live performances return! Here we go
with Part 1.
Robert Bresson (1901-1999) was the grandfather of the French
New Wave of the 1960s. Arrogant, domineering, scornful of other lesser
directors, he had an unwavering confidence in his own unique genius. He was
revered by younger French directors like Francois Truffaut and Jean-Luc Godard, and was one of the originators of the cult
of the auteur that controlled minutely every aspect of a film from
writing to directing to editing. Bresson
believed that film should be its own, absolutely integral art form, distinct
from theater, visual art, opera, etc. He devised specific techniques to ensure
that he was not producing “filmed plays”, which he loathed and felt was the
essence of 99% of movies. So, for example, he used no professional actors,
preferring amateurs he could hyper-control by making them do take after take,
until they were so worn down that they finally displayed the unaffected
naturalness that he sought. This produces a very odd affect when you see his
films. Initially it seems underacted to the point of boredom, with uninflected,
undramatic delivery of lines. But then you gradually realize that you are
seeing a reflection of reality, not acted reality. Ditto his visuals. Watch
the opening of Au Hasard Balthazar (Balthazar at Random), as we see our protagonist, the donkey Balthazar as a baby, surrounded by
sheep and their bells (remember that sound, just like the sounds of my hikes in
the Alps). He is taken in by a local family, and baptized by the children, but
watch Bresson’s unique style during the baptism--we do not see the faces of the
people, only their hands, and views outside the house are clouded by a grainy
window. Also note at 2:00 in the clip the first appearance of the second movement
of Schubert’s Piano Sonata in A major, a recurring theme used at key moments throughout
a film, providing an emotional underlining to a film that mostly has no background
score except for the sounds of nature. We actually first meet this beautiful piano
work in the credits, in which Bresson condenses
the entire affect of the film as a sort of orchestral prelude (make sure you watch
through the first minute to get the full effect!).
Bresson tries to use film to capture true reality, not
cinematic reality. In Bresson’s films we are in a room, see the doors open, a
character exit, then watch the door closing behind them with a paused view of
the closed door, just as we might if we were actually in the room. On a busy street, we see the legs
of the passing people, but not their faces (that’s what Bresson said that he
looks at, head down, as he walks in the city). Watch this make-out scene of two
awkward teenagers, and the balance between ultra-restrained faces and darting
eyes and probing hands . We even get the Schubert, and, of course Balthazar iconically nearby. All
this is Bresson’s way of trying to use film to capture truth, reality and
spirituality at the same time.
What is this film about? Well, the life of the donkey
Balthazar, but not in any Americanized Lassie or Mr. Ed sort of
way. Balthazar provides a spiritual center of the film, with a moving cast of people
ranging from tawdry to profound to sociopathic circling around him. We see a
very routine plot of teenagers robbing, smuggling goods and raping a local girl,
rather like a plot of a 1950’s B movie, but somehow, Bresson keeps bringing
Balthazar back as a Christ-like center that makes us see these human activities
and drama as trivial when juxtaposed with certain Balthazar-like deeper truths.
Bresson was raised a Catholic and rejected much of that church’s formal
teaching, but kept searching for spiritual meaning in life. In many ways Au
Hasard Balthazar is his greatest film—what better way to hyper-control an
actor than use a non-human one? Even there, he complained in an interview some
years later that the donkey was becoming too “expressive” and demonstrative by
the end of filming, and less “restrained and natural”.
The ending of the movie, as we actually see Balthazar die
amid a beatific flock of sheep, is one of the great movie endings ever (perhaps
alongside the end of the world in Lars von Trier’s Melancholia, set to
music of Wagner). Watch it here. We are high in the mountains. Balthazar has been wounded (another Christ image),
and his human tormentors have fled (the disciples run). We are left with just the
donkey and sublime nature. But now there’s the sound of sheep again, now in the
distance. They approach. We barely see the shepherd (Balthazar is The Shepherd).
They surround the fading Balthazar. Then at 1:35 back comes the Schubert, escorting
the donkey from life, but only for playing for 40 seconds, with the film ending with just the sound of the sheep
bells. Wow. This is one of the more unlikely films to describe, yet it really
works and always lingers in my thoughts for weeks afterwards whenever I see it.
An odd cousin of this great film is Vagabond (originally titled Sans toit ni loi (Without Shelter
or Law). This is a striking film from 1985 from the great French director Agnès
Varda (1938-2019). This feminist film
follows a ruthlessly, brutally independent teenage girl Mona as she backpacks her
way around a rural area working odd jobs, sleeping with random men, and
rejecting any real human connections. Varda does not share Bresson’s
spirituality in this film, which is coldly realistic, literally. It begins with
our seeing her dead frozen body in a ditch, and at the end we watch her freeze
to death, a symmetry of despair rather than of Bresson’s spiritual optimism.
Yet there are many similarities in the two films. Varda hired an 18-year-old
neophyte actress Sandrine Bonnaire to play the lead. She in on-film every
minute, and achieves a transparent naturalism that has much more dramatic range
than Bresson’s catatonic non-actors, yet feels very real. Oddly, after seeing the Bresson film, I felt
that Varda used her teen protagonist Mona in the same way as Bresson used his
donkey. The world and its perverse characters circle around Mona and are all affected
by her (the characters are interviewed about their memories of her after she is
found dead, as would occur in a news broadcast). As in Bresson, we see the tortured
lives of the inhabitants with Mona as a lens. The film is relentlessly cold and
brutal, and lacks the uplift of Au Hasard Balthasar, but in her own
gritty way I think Ms. Varda was trying the same thing as Bresson. Perhaps we
should judge ourselves by how we interact with the lowest of society—whether a
donkey or a dirty vagabond.
Comments
Post a Comment