Theater Review: Susan Sarandon in Jesse Eisenberg's lukewarm Happy Talk
Happy Talk
Written by Jesse Eisenberg
Directed by Scott Elliott
Starring Susan Sarandon
The New Group
Pershing Square Signature Center, Manhattan
May 19, 2019
The Manhattan off-Broadway theater company The New Group is
a little hard to peg. They alternate between interesting, edgy new plays by
unknown playwrights and star-studded plays written by famous actors, e.g.
Hamish Linklater’s The Whirligig and
Wallace Shawn’s Evening at the Talk House.
The latter category of productions sometimes seem to me as a type of vanity
exercise—an actor writes an adequate play, then gets his famous colleagues to come
by and act in it, presumably at a discounted cost to the company, while selling
out the house. Happy Talk by 35 year
old actor Jesse Eisenberg (The Social
Network) is another such example. Eisenberg has written plays before. He usually
acts in them as well, but did not here, focusing our attention on the 72 year old Susan Sarandon (Thelma and Louise, Dead Man Walking), who revels in this retro-styled star vehicle for an scene chewing diva.
Happy Talk is an
old-style starlet play derived from What
Ever Happened to Baby Jane?, to which it hews a bit too closely. Sarandon
plays Lorraine, a manipulative, frustrated, aging actress now starring in local
Jewish theater productions (currently Bloody Mary in South Pacific), always imagining her impact on the audience and the
world as greater than it is. She displays the full range of diva gestures and
narcissistic rages to her family, which consists of a nearly silent, intellectual
husband with a neurologic disorder, and a distanced, angry daughter who sets
the play’s events off with a surprise visit that stirs the dysfunctional, yet
stable family pot. The play is more interesting after the daughter arrives;
before that it is mostly a catalog of opportunities for Ms. Sarandon to
channel and display her inner Joan Crawford—this she does, if not always with
much subtlety or nuance. The target of most of Lorraine’s manipulation, and the
dramatic plot crux of the play, is the Serbian immigrant live-in maid Ljuba who
is saving up to bring her family to the USA. The play is timely in that it
highlights the vulnerability of such immigrants to financial and other
manipulation by their employers. However, Marin Ireland’s performance as the
maid lacked the nuance and depth that would have made her a truly sympathetic character.
I liked how Mr. Eisenberg did not show
his tragic cards and the depths of Lorraine’s psychopathy too early—Lorraine comes
across early in the play as just a delusional, flighty, somewhat pathetic aging
artiste. Later in the play she evolves into something quite different, and quite
menacing. Scary narcissists are all the rage these days, I fear. Sarandon
performs this transition well, but is limited by playwright Eisenberg’s
restricted range of dialogue and ability to build and release tension.
Eisenberg’s attention to black comedic detail is good, and
better than his overall play construction. Similar to 1930’s films, Lorraine is
given a nice range of one liners. For example, commenting on her mute husband’s
obsession with Civil War historical trivia, she says…”all old men get fixated
on that war at one time or another before they die…it’s men’s ticket to the River
Styx.” While in the best of those old films the humor makes us cringe when the
horror behind the mask emerges, that was less successful here. Mr. Eisenberg
and Ms. Sarandon did not quite achieve the linear increments of discomfort and
horror that the best of these works do—the ending came too much as a surprise. Also
updating 1930’s style, there was an appearance by a bitchy, witty gay friend
similar to many such characters in old movies—only here the gayness was
explicit (and delivered by an Asian actor), not just coded. All in all, I
did not see much in Happy Talk to
suggest that Mr. Eisenberg has what it takes to be anything more than a
literately entertaining playwright, a sort of updated, cynical Noël
Coward. In that sense, a revival of the 1930’s spirit of diva-driven entertainment
is not such a bad thing, as long as the production of such efforts do not
prevent the emergence of more talented playwrights with more to say.
Comments
Post a Comment