Film Review: Cuarón’s Roma Envelops the Eyes and Ears
Roma
Written and Directed by Alfonso Cuarón
My favorite current directors, each with an individual style and
penchant for risk-taking, are Paul Thomas Anderson (Boogie Nights, There Will Be Blood), Michael Hanecke (The Piano Teacher, The White Ribbon),
Lars von Trier (Breaking the Waves, Melancholia),
and Alfonso Cuarón. Cuarón has succeeded in a variety of styles, ranging from
the realistic road movie Y Tu Mama También
(2001) and the apocalyptic sci-fi Children
of Men (2006) to perhaps my favorite space movie Gravity (2013). Each left me wondering at his vision of another world.
His consistently compelling visual style always leaves me with mind-pictures
from the films even after I have forgotten details of the plot. His new film Roma is more of the same, and has all
the critics salivating. It is perhaps closest to Y Tu Mama También in conception, returning to autobiographical
material from Cuarón’s youth in Roma, a walled-off upper crust enclave of Mexico
City. The earlier film Y Tu Mama También showed
how two entitled adolescents fare when outside the enclave, and when faced with
real life in the form of a sensuous, complex, older woman. Roma is women-centered, more of a direct commentary on the enclave
itself and on Cuarón’s childhood, seen mostly through the eyes of an indigina maid/nanny who holds a rich
family of six together as the marriage dissolves. The contrast between the life
of privilege seen here and the poverty and working class areas surrounding it
are quite relevant to our times. The film is striking for its unusual narrative
approach and for the immense beauty of its cinematography… Cuaron did his own filming for this one, as his longtime cameraman
was unavailable. So this was a true auteur
effort. Perhaps Cuarón made all the meals for the crew as well.
What makes this film both more striking and more difficult than
his other films is its lack of a traditional plot. It is essentially a slice of
life movie, and while there are peaks and valleys, these are not of the traditional
cinematic sort. Instead, they are more like the ups and downs of your life as
you might remember it decades later, including random unimportant events as
well as big things like moves, divorces, and deaths. These are not all given
the expected cinematic weight, just as decades later, a death might not
register in your consciousness as vividly as did a minor family trip. It takes
a while to get into this flow, but once you do, it’s fascinating to enter this
very personal lens of Mr. Cuaron. You need to just wait him out without looking
for constant dramatic clues about what the upcoming plot twist might be…because
that twist may not ever actually occur, just as in real life. The wonderfully
impassive acting of Yalitza Aparicio as the maid suits this well.
She rarely
shows emotion, despite her own personal tragedies, and places her job above her
personal needs, as do many working class people. In contrast, the rich wife
seems more buffeted about by her defeats. A wonderful recurring metaphor occurs
when first the (philandering) husband and then his wife try to park their
too-large car in the narrow apartment passageway, bumping and denting it
despite meticulous care. Later in the move, after the husband has left her, she
stops trying, trashing the car as she drunkenly tries the same maneuver.
Finally, later in the film, as she has adjusted to her husband’s departure, she
just buys a smaller car that she can actually park. The film is filled with
such visual metaphors and clues, which serve as important a role as the plot
does to convey the life of this family. In a way, the accumulation of details,
like our accumulation of random memories, is what drives this film forward. Cuarón
conveys the illusion that he is just tapping into memory, not making a film
(rather like Proust, Joyce, or Thomas Wolfe in Look Homeward Angel). This is not true, of course, but its what he
makes us feel. These authors, via some variant of stream of consciousness, try
to tell us how their characters feel,
not just what they do. Cuarón relies
on his images and selective depiction of events to get us inside his characters’
psyches, mostly rejecting traditional plot and dialogue to help us.
Especially notable in this film is its stunning black and white
cinematography and visual composition. It’s a little ironic that most will see
this film on their TV on Netflix (the producer). It really benefitted from a
big screen, so one could revel in its beauty. Cuarón’s amazing eye takes us
into the eye of a woman as she gives birth, including all the chaos in the
delivery suite around her; into the waves surrounding two of the young kids who
are sucked out into the tide at the beach, as we see them struggling from a very
slowly bobbing camera seeming perched on the water itself; and into a 1970’s
student riot crushed by the police, as seen from above from the windows of a
furniture store, this time with an animated camera that conveys the chaos and tragedy.
While a very realistic film in style, there are also some clear visual
references: a mother holds her child like the Pieta during the riot; the
reflection of a soaring airplane is seen in the cleaning water as the maid
cleans up dog poop (the world moves on as do our humdrum lives), and the family clusters into a Renaissance-style holy family triangle after the near-drowning.
Just as remarkable is the sound design—yet another reason to see
it in a real theater. Sounds come from all corners of the room, a device
normally exploited for sci-fi explosions and space battles. Here, we hear the chaos in the delivery
room, including inappropriate comments by staff; in this movie we hear what it’s like to be in a riot; we hear waves closing down around us as we
are pulled out by the tide. It’s part of the flood of memories that the
director is sharing with us.
I’m not sure I would have had the stamina for this film in my
younger days—its lack of plot would have tried my patience. But, having had
similar memories of my youth, I was now very able to tune into Cuarón’s remarkable
radio frequency and enjoy the film as a unique artist’s take on memory. That,
when combined with the stunning visual images, sound, and cinematography make
this a must-see--another great film by perhaps our greatest living director. Just
as his Gravity showed the true artistic
potential of 3-D, this one shows how cutting-edge cinematography and sound together
can make a film great. This is yet another unique vision by a director who refuses
to just repeat his past successes. Try to see it on the biggest screen with the
best sound system you can!
Comments
Post a Comment